Elaine, interesting suggestion but I would think that the posting period should not affect the document balance in this manner. If you run a period sensitive aging and the check document is a future period document it should not even show on the report (unless the report has a logic error that I am not aware of). It is correct that the period sensitive aging computes the document balance based on the posting period specified so I suppose there could be a logic error in that process. I suggest that the user runs the standard AP aging and see if this check has a negative balance or not. They could also run the vendor trial balance and see if that check shows with a negative balance. Thinking along your line, it might be interesting to construct a test where a current period check is paying future documents. If the real check document balance is 0.00 then the issue has to be in the apadjust records for that check whereas the period sensitive aging is getting confused when trying the computer the check document balance.
↧
